Re: [EVGRAY] Secrets of Antihravity propulsion.

Body

Indeed Tesla did not say that,  Darrel Fox said that and idiots, sorry,
flat earthers as you prefer to be known, confused it.


On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:52 AM george gray [email protected]
[EVGRAY] <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Hi Ole,
>
> Are you claiming that Tesla did not make this statement about the earth
> not being a planet and where he claimed the stars are attached to the
> firmament and where he condemned the theory of heliocentrism and
> Einsteins's theory?
>
> George
>
> On Monday, 16 July 2018, 8:22:53 pm AEST, [email protected] [EVGRAY]
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi George,
>
> This sounds like the flat earth conspiracy. Tesla considered the earth as
> a globe that he could resonate and even reflect the signals at the
> antipode. He used the earth as one pole and the ionosphere or some other
> conductive layer as the other pole.
>
> "Electromagnetic levitation disproves gravity because the only force you
> need to counter is the electromagnetic force, not gravity."
> Gravity may actually be some side effect of electromagnetism as suspected
> by the research of William J. Hooper. Daniel Fry was told that gravity
> could be manipulated by just using electrons.
>
> The motional electric field from moving charges like electrons can't be
> shielded and thus behaves like gravity. This may actually be the same force
> that is known as gravity. Remember many books of physics splits up
> electromagnetism in separate disciplines like electrostatics magnetism and
> electrodynamics. Other books like that of W.B. Smith, W.J. Hooper or Ivor
> Catt's books claim that the forces are united and can't be separated in the
> real world. Thus gravity belongs to a unified field theory and can't be
> separated from the other fields as they all interact and are part of each
> other. W.J. Hooper and I. Catt have shown that the signals may seemingly
> cancel out but the effects of the components of the fields still show up in
> experiments looking for them.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <canowindracd@...> wrote :
>
> Well here are Tesla's thoughts on gravity.
>
> "Earth is a realm, it is not a planet. It is not an object, therefore, it
> has no edge. Earth would be more easily defined as a system environment.
> Earth is also a machine, it is a Tesla coil. The sun and moon are powered
> wirelessly with the electromagnetic field (the Aether). This field also
> suspends the celestial spheres with electro-magnetic levitation. Electromagnetic
> levitation disproves gravity because the only force you need to counter is
> the electromagnetic force, not gravity. The stars are attached to the
> firmament".
>
> "Trust me heliocentrism & Einstein is a joke".
>
>
>
>
> On Sunday, 15 July 2018, 11:38:07 pm AEST, onielsen@... [EVGRAY] <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Warren,
>
> There is also the theory of W.B. Smith and W.J Hooper that gravity is a
> weak secondary effect of electromagnetism. This theory states that all
> atoms have orbiting atoms that radiates electromagnetic fields which
> interacts with other atoms doing the same thing. The interaction is through
> the motional magnetic field which can't be shielded or at least it hasn't
> been shown to be possible to do that. Same holds for gravity. Instead of
> electromagnetism sound waves can be used to simulate the effect as can be
> seen in the theory of rhytmodynamics.
> http://rhythmodynamics.com/menu/TV_player2.htm
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <schoonersolsticemoon@...> wrote :
>
>
> Darrell
> That is great.
>  Sometimes in the midst of moving tons of timber, and rock, a person needs
> a rest from the moil, and toil on this planet's crust; to take a moment to
> share the ideas of others.
> The balance of of the roar of a diesel excavator against conceptual events
> inside a coffee cup, can, and perhaps should, stagger the brain.
> In the realm of maniacs, tangible reality is a precious resource not to be
> squandered.
> Yet, for pursuit of a better picture of what matter really is,  no stone
> should be unturned, as it were.
> Gravity cannot be simply taken for granted, defenistration aside,
> A mere hundred years ago, learned men wrote careful papers saying that
> heavier than air flight was impossible. Some part of us may still question
> this as our plane takes what seems for ever, to leave the runway.
> Now the very substance of matter evading gravitational pull, in another
> even more exciting manner, is being presented.
> Who would not want to read this?
> Each of us has to bend to the ongoing task of providing collective reality
> checks, using our own brains, such as they are.
> Getting accurate information from reliable sources is the ongoing
> challenge. It helps, when one gets a book review by trusted peers.
> Cheers Warren
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 at 12:44 AM, Iuliu Hossu iuliu.hossu@... [EVGRAY]
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Not yet, just found it on the Internet
>
> https://www.redhill.net.nz/ufo/audio/u/UFOs%20and%20Aliens/Secrets%20of%20Antigravity%20Propulsion,%20Tesla,%20UFOs%20and%20Classified%20Aerospace%20Technology%20-%20Paul%20A%20LaViolette.pdf
>
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 6:31 PM, edarrell71@... [EVGRAY] <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> [image:
> https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51kEJibyM8L._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg]
>
> Hello my friends, anyone in here ever read a copy of this book?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>