Re: [EVGRAY] Re: Moonbounce

Database ID: 108319
2018-06-06T23:06:56+00:00
onielsen2000 <[email protected]>

← View thread

Message-ID
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Body

Hi Mick,

The RF beam must be as narrow as possible to not spread out the energy to places where it does no good. The guy I told about used a helical antenna. I don't know anything about how he did it and the power used. One way could be by using the predecessor of the LASER which was the MASER. This would transmit a thin beam of microwaves.

This Wikipedia article (https://wiki2.org/en/Earth%E2%80%93Moon%E2%80%93Earth_communication https://wiki2.org/en/Earth%E2%80%93Moon%E2%80%93Earth_communication) has a gallery of antennas used for earth moon earth communication. It tells that as low as 100W can be used when using digital signal processing.

Regards
Ole
 

---In [email protected], <mkjekyll@...> wrote :

 Ole,
 Specifically the math is messing with my head.  Either I am misunderstanding / applying the math else according to FPL calculations antenna gain and dbW something the distance of the moon should not be feasible without millions of watts of transmitter power.
 Laserbounce is another story due to the reflectors and the fact a laser stays colimated enough not to disperse as quickly as does Rf.

 
 On 6/6/2018 3:04 PM, onielsen@... mailto:onielsen@... [EVGRAY] wrote:

   Hi Mick,
 
 The problem by using the moon as a reflector could be made more efficient if placing a RF reflector just like the LASER reflectors already out there. Another way could be making a RF repeater like is done in communication satellites. It would probably be much cheaper to put up a communication satellite or to use one of the many already up there.
 
 The surface of the moon isn't a good conductor (I guess) and it may even spread out the signal instead of reflecting it back to the transmitter like it is done with corner reflectors https://wiki2.org/en/Corner_reflector. This gives great loss of the received signal.
 
 Regards
 Ole

 
 
 ---In [email protected] mailto:[email protected], <mkjekyll@...> mailto:mkjekyll@... wrote :
 
 https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/ham_radio/amateur-propagation/moonbounce-propagation-eme.php https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/ham_radio/amateur-propagation/moonbounce-propagation-eme.php

 Here is a link for ham radio folk about EME or moonbounce radio.  The path loss in best case scenarios is very high.
 
 
 Can someone who knows more RF electronics theory such as Ole or Hector please comment as to how this is overcome with 1000 watt input transmitter when the maximum theoretical S/N ratio and 252 db PL should require transmitters larger than AM radio stations.
 
 
 I must be missing something.  Also checking the amateur radio sites for an answer.
 
 
 

 Thanks,
 Mick

References

<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>

Headers

Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Sender [email protected]
X-Apparently-To [email protected]
X-Received (qmail 47467 invoked by uid 102); 6 Jun 2018 23:07:38 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mtaq3.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.196.204.226) by m17.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Jun 2018 23:07:38 -0000
X-Received (qmail 29883 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2018 23:07:38 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mta4002.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (10.221.2.24) by mtaq3.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Jun 2018 23:07:38 -0000
X-Original-Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Received-SPF pass (domain of yahoogroups.com designates 66.163.190.92 as permitted sender)
X-YMailISG WTBb4esWLDvflAZArXM_AMYd0gvQKK1FU8bn6_bP80yeYBMO kTgyxGGLQCbgfNTCdEPxUloHcNpG2pWLfIepkbSbUOEXK9DoZAka2Wq1iMPT HwDz08BB9Dxy0wDqn2kiSIua49ZgFWfsMXHgm9vZ4r2k.ykrQ4yxL0A0wIi0 wVqi6J3Zg4iZGbnh7TuuJC3Hw6VMjooe1j.qcFF_q2GSBJ9bFtNOJQjh4bfl EoxppChEacQTQrjLOT1JLztTAvfBeUO3NAT6JYE_ZdgOLdyUQ6SsEU1TsLOc _yKOXMHYJPqNDsOEiMuKfTR06kQCAnsi4jO8D3vOiFy63UqOBTafyq_0oBNC Q2CFicOSfsZoPjqeKUbd6q0PKPNX78ZulCyERjwDMlZAlFxM6XklyocDg4V7 CmjTawuHZ2FHAGFCHaPyl.rCLyMBr2yfPD34puHL5UQ7wmeROsCwTbm78l73 U7pbmJk.ojKr6K8h60GCCTADdJ3Qgkz1cYKyL94OwM.JDbFAib2XQfY11vpz fPfePiRBk5R_fzLrghaOHfQ544WwhxqLFzxFNiO2WiowdTympTODRaNaX_Yw dNEgdzvoR.4QBv33BYILyrEF2xGqVnPBRc2EN7dzfIE9qJfkcaQTTDfVhJ7m rRSqGLkpxokFAbaxaBzKZ65jOgd0bJ7AIO520mzL4EVv1wga29lFRqoW66wF FodInHFnqhtZ0XJwZw0qg_ax1uUwob59VAr5wcE9.406Qu4JjzzCY9xB8Hrm AL4FlvfV3jA1OzletyPof6BiXxKbqGvyh.sbubExgnXVNcb.cGEn.He3bIQU EGZQfyMFtr5hlFAXzNV8lWWnVOCzdUqvuQpuqT4ZQ7fAO8a4rSIzW91.5ttD NOPA5WAF8.YxXNj5Z9y5P0qW4ZbjD1_JDF4Qt.7x4FFscok6oA97p9BC63Lj WmC994iU5KlwXlHWZoLxPQbenxf8diEiO1IESln2c66go.UvHgTX.yJHTT1Y dAbWfg1LsEsArWkDiuDzIWaaR5UJXTRMa3H7Trxsjqyz7dg1YfSyXzvJxckQ 0_.DP9JQA2PD942BGJhUr1XKm1.pgSM0q3CPZD9Gn8VtPP1TfQyc__nZqDIm 13fZ5GUoP701Y7apdYE8CTvOewD6daVMjjZ0KzupS0L5lu5D9Mn2TDK.88Ni igl31KfE.lFfG1Zwi_IjIixnFIf.f2eEuLDKA9vEewDLIBMsVbL8R4UzDsZB X0Lf8sJCW.m1doUrk_fJx_d8in2OiobLnV.6Uszb
Authentication-Results mta4002.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=yahoogroups.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=yahoogroups.com; dkim=permerror (bad sig)
X-Received from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO sonic323-30.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (66.163.190.92) by mta4002.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Wed, 06 Jun 2018 23:07:37 +0000
X-Received from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic323.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 23:07:37 +0000
Date Wed, 06 Jun 2018 23:06:56 +0000
X-Received from [127.0.0.1] by gapi3.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jun 2018 23:06:56 -0000
To [email protected]
X-Original-Return-Path [email protected]
X-Original-From [email protected]
X-Mailer Yahoo Groups Message Poster
References <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property groups-compose
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To <[email protected]>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="9nlWnTS9ocNmxdhsK3FKVLWiM6a5jwOaA8HvrLV"
X-Originating-IP 94.145.130.243
X-Yahoo-Post-IP 94.145.130.243
Reply-To [email protected]
Subject Re: [EVGRAY] Re: Moonbounce
X-Yahoo-Group-Post member; u=115023864; y=q35EnsJr4G48cVl3mjFOUrXTt3mfcPgOUQrtSvCf80JC3pzSkLXv
X-Yahoo-Profile onielsen2000
From [email protected]