Re: [EVGRAY] FLYING IN SPACE WITH A REAL FLY ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE STATION!!!

Body

The videos of the 60's and 70's were pure analog. Digital video https://wiki2.org/en/Digital_video first appeared in the late 1970's.

Here are two articles explaining the technology used in the moon landings:
https://wiki2.org/en/Apollo_TV_camera https://wiki2.org/en/Apollo_TV_camera
https://wiki2.org/en/Apollo_11_missing_tapes https://wiki2.org/en/Apollo_11_missing_tapes

The first video recordings were made on 1 inch 14 track audio tapes. This was the raw slow scan signal. The raw signal was also sent to a 10 inch monitor where it was filmed by a video camera using 30 fps for broadcasting.

 https://wiki2.org/en/File:Apollo11A_jpg 

 
 
 
 Photo of the high-quality SSTV image before the scan conversion
 
 
 
 https://wiki2.org/en/File:Apollo11b_jpg 

 
 
 
 
 The degraded image after the SSTV scan conversion


The images are from the last link above.

Regards
Ole
 

---In [email protected], <mkjekyll@...> wrote :

 Warren, 

 I do not believe that a Satun 5 contrivance had the fuel available to go to the moon and return.  No way.
 

 What did Hitler say the bigger the lie the more it would be believed.  We did by the way have a bunch of nazis running the moon program.
 

 When Von Braun made the careful calculations in the 50s he said it would require three rockets and a space station in order enough fuel would be available to get there by rocketry. 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXIDFx74aSY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXIDFx74aSY

 

 Somehow based on the "results" of the Apollo missions this would have him in error by about 50 thousand concerning fuel requirements and engine power.  So from 55 to 69 our rockets suddenly became 50 thousand times more efficient or Von Braun the head of the program was an idiot.  I don't know, they still were hydrazine fueld engines, hmm...  He did make an awesome model for Dr Strangelove though.
 

 Or staying on the 250 degree moon for 3 days in tin foil oven with battery powered air conditioning uh huh.
 

 No doubt the astro-nots were brave souls but the story is too flimsy and full of holes to believe.  As a child I saw the 69 moon landing and asked my dad why the flag was waving if there is no atmosphere.  In the original clip it sure looked to have some breeze ruffling it rather than a spring top bouncing as they show now.
 

 But most of all just the video is prima facie evidence of a big lie. You are a ham operator how did slow scan TV provide extra frames?
 And 10 frame per second looked smoother than 30/60 NTSC interleave, what? what? what? If the original footage was shot at 10 frames the movements would have been jumpier than the first silent movies.  Or if one recalls what the first webcams looked like over dialup then one would have a good idea, even a Faroujda line doubler would not have smoothed the motion.  We did not have video morphing technology then and even now it requires rendering time so then so where did the extra fucking frames come from on an alleged live feed?
 

 All the original tapes from the time were lost or recorded over by NASA by their own admission.  The most amazing part of the 20th century recorded over. Uh huh...
 

 Everything was bounced off the geo sattelite they first put up to emulate communications from the moon.
 Most was shot on a sound stage or in Flagstaff outdoors where they made an exact mockup of hundreds of craters to mimic the sea of tranquility exactly at scale.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7W-SAd6mak https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7W-SAd6mak
  So much evidence of swarmy mimicry and special effects operations.
 

 "Building a camera that could survive the crushing g forces of liftoff and then function in near-weightlessness on the moon was only part of the challenge for Lebar. The portion of the broadcast spectrum traditionally used for video was sending vital ship data to Earth, and there was no room left for the standard black-and-white video format of the era: 525 scan lines of data at 30 frames per second, transmitted at 4.5 MHz. So Lebar helped devise a smaller "oddball format" – 320 scan lines at 10 fps, transmitted at a meager 500 kHz. Tracking stations back on Earth would take this so-called slow-scan footage, convert it for TV broadcast, and beam it to Mission Control, which would send it out for the world to see."