Body
Ron,
It's a bit more complex but that's the gist. Basically when a
certificate of live birth is created and sent to the dept of commerce a
serial number is numerated which gets activated upon the signing of the
social security agreement. This has over 1000 pages of terms and
conditions so it is interesting how many people inform on their own
kids, yeah the signature on the BC says informer where the parent
signs. Ok yes at the point of signing the SSA the trust for that
individual is created in a similar name to theirs but in all caps as you
said in order to ( I assume) prevent the person from knowing if they are
acting under the auspices of beneficiary or trustee or as a sovereign
individual.
There are two governments, one as an overlay on top of the other. There
are still common law courts but very few operate this way. In the US
there is the court of international trade which has a proper article
three judge. One can create their own common law court and this is the
kind of shit that puts fear in knowledgeable judges. A common law court
can be convened by a group of We the People with serious implications.
One only need be "learned in the law" and not a BAR member. There were
many supreme court justices who were not BARisters before the BAR union
took over the court system. An attorney at law being an officer of the
courts cannot represent a free individual without lots of adhesion
agreements compromising representation as they have first and foremost
responsibility to the courts as an officer of same. They can only
represent a "person". In a criminal case when they send in the public
pretender ask them to sign an written agreement that the representative
can and will represent the living soul not the person or trust with no
conflict of interest or prior liens interests or encumbrances in law or
equity and they will decline the case. It's a good way to prevent
becoming a ward of the State. Mostly anyone represented by an attorney
is giving up their rights as a free soul and stipulating to acting on
behalf of the trust as a ward, good way to get warehoused. A capital
case however is most likely run as close to common law as one will get.
If you say I want to represent myself as pro per they always will say
you mean pro se trying to trick you back into the trust relationship.
Some old federal circuit judges still know this info, most are not hip
to it now and just function as told. Just try to find out what system
the court is operating under and one will never get a straight answer.
Many remedies are defined in the federal rules of civil procedure, it's
a good book to read if one enjoys the law. The hardest part dealing with
these people is getting rid of all the presumptions of who one is, the
FRCP will provide a head start.
All this shit started here during the civil reconstruction culminated in
1933 after the 20 year trial period of the Federal Reserve act of 1913
was made permanent after the markets were crashed and the gold sucked
out of the treasury when it was bankrupted. The US was forced into
receivership in 1933 same as you guys. Here they called it the New
Deal, how about up there?
The politicians loved it as they now had an open checkbook. To be 100
percent fair I have to add perhaps without the funny money the extreme
growth of industry would have blown out all the gold and silver backed
currency and we would have had insane inflation and lack of liquidity.
But the way it worked out they stole all our commercial energy and now a
paid off home which used to be about two or three years wages to own is
just a dream for most. Now a family with kids both parents have to work
to make ends meet. Notwithstanding currently all the time saving devices
one person can accomplish many more times the work of an individual back
in the day a home was a few years salary.
On 3/22/2018 12:30 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>
> Hi Mick,
>
>
>
> I don't know about Canada, did gold ever become illegal to hold in
> your country?
>
>
>
> No but Canada did declare bankruptcy around '33 and we were put up as
> chattel.
>
>
> Good to hear/talk with someone who knows the score!
>
>
>
> What Warren misses is the law system is admiralty law, common law is
> not practised anywhere anymore? All the Lawyers are all sworn to the
> BAR (Queen) they expedit the SYSTEM
>
>
> When the “law” wants to talk to you you become your stawman with your
> name in all capital letters.
>
>
> George Carlin says it better than I can...
>
>
> Ron
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5dBZDSSky0
>
>
>