AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Aw: Re: AW: [EVGRAY] Re: Kone & Hector, you guys finally did it!

Database ID: 105968
2018-01-26T10:42:06+01:00
Sven Friedrich <[email protected]>

← View thread

Message-ID
In-Reply-To: NONE

Body

Hi Ole, the transformer is designed for primary 230v according to the nameplate. With what voltage should I then measure the current? The transformers are also different in the saturation, although the transformers are identical, I think I have a video of it. Greetings Sven

Von Samsung Mobile gesendet

-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: "[email protected] [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]> 
Datum:26.01.2018  10:29  (GMT+01:00) 
An: [email protected] 
Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Aw: Re: AW: [EVGRAY] Re: Kone & Hector, you guys finally did it! 

Hi Sven,

That current is too much. There should be almost no current flowing. This is the full magnetizing current at no load  condition. This drives the transformer close to saturation. To make the transformer cheaper the no load magnetization is put closer to saturation to squeeze higher power density through the transformer. Perhaps the transformer is for 220 or 230V?!

Try the measurement at some less current to avoid saturation of the core. At 0.5A there will be 0.5V per Ohm of non-inductive voltage. This also influences the calculation. If using the winding as a choke it mustn't go into saturation as this prevents it from working as a choke. I.e. the inductance almost disappears when saturated and thus prevents the choke from storing any more energy.

Regards
Ole


---In [email protected], <s.friedrich@...> wrote :


Hello Ole, you have quite right volts divided by electricity. that's how I calculate it. The ohmic share I leave except because it is identical transformers unfortunately they do not behave the same. I have set several test voltages and can not get a common linearity. I can apply additional windings to the transformers but there are only partial successes. I have now tuned both transformers at 240 volts. It will flow at both transformers then 579- 582 mA. If I increase the voltage by 1 volt, the current increases massively, but just different for each transformer. I do not know how Hector wants to tune the coils because they always behave differently at different voltages. This 0.003 deviation I can only measure the current. An LCR meter that is so accurate I can probably not afford. Greetings Sven


Von Samsung Mobile gesendet


-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: "onielsen@... [EVGRAY]" 
Datum:26.01.2018 01:33 (GMT+01:00) 
An: [email protected] 
Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Aw: Re: AW: [EVGRAY] Re: Kone & Hector, you guys finally did it! 

 
Hi Sven,

I'm not sure I understand. The impedance is the voltage divided by the current. The inductive reactance is the imaginary part of the impedance where the current lags 90 degrees behind the voltage. If the current doesn't lag 90 degrees behind the voltage then there's also resistance in series with the coil.

If the series resistance is small compared to the inductive reactance the reactance can be calculated as the voltage divided by the current because the reactance becomes equal to the impedance when the resistance is decreased to zero. The phase angle Φ between the voltage and current will then increase to 90 degrees.

     
The figure is taken from here: https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/ac-inductance.html

As the inductive reactance is

Where f is the frequency and L the inductance the inductance then becomes:

Assuming low resistance compared to the reactance XL this latter almost becomes equal to the impedance Z. At high current the core of an inductor can saturate which decreases the inductance. Thus make the measurements at low current to avoid saturating the core. Perhaps this is what you're expiring. The phase angle between the voltage and current can be checked with a scope to be sure it is 90 degrees. Else this simple calculation doesn't apply and the resistance or the phase angle has to be known too for the correct calculation of the inductance.

Regards
Ole



---In [email protected], <s.friedrich@...> wrote :


Hello Ole, it is not accurate at 50Hz to measure the reactive current and to calculate the inductance over xl because these devices work anyway with 50 Hz and I work with this frequency in my experiments. The differences are extremely measured from 250 mH inductance to 1.12 H calculated inductance over xl. Greetings Sven


Von Samsung Mobile gesendet


-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: "onielsen@... [EVGRAY]" 
Datum:25.01.2018 13:09 (GMT+01:00) 
An: [email protected] 
Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Aw: Re: AW: [EVGRAY] Re: Kone & Hector, you guys finally did it! 

 
Hi Sven,

"My LCR meter shows completely different values ​​as the calculation over XL"
The calculation also has to take into account the resistance and capacitance. Some LCR meters can measure the device under test at different frequencies to change the influence of the parasitic parts of the device. E.g. like watching the influence of the capacitance and resistance of an inductor.

The parasitic parts of a coil can be found with a sine generator and an oscilloscope and some calculations. The inductance can be found as well.

Inductor model:

The image is taken from here: http://www.techlib.com/area_50/Readers/Craig/switching.htm
For explanation go the bottom chapter "Real World Inductors" on that page.

Regards
Ole



---In [email protected], <s.friedrich@...> wrote :



Hi Ole, Warren, I can not build the capacitors myself. Tuning the inductors is a challenge. I can still calculate the reactance when I put the transformer to 50 Hz 230v and measure the mA. Then Xl = U x I. If I bring both transformers to the same XL value I have the same inductance. My LCR meter shows completely different values ​​as the calculation over XL. Greetings Sven
Von Samsung Mobile gesendet


-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: "Warren Keillor schoonersolsticemoon@... [EVGRAY]" 
Datum:25.01.2018 01:29 (GMT+01:00) 
An: [email protected] 
Betreff: Re: AW: Re: Aw: Re: AW: [EVGRAY] Re: Kone & Hector, you guys finally did it! 

 
Sven

You change the uf value by simply taking scissors and trimming down the aluminium foil that is inside the plastic sheet. You can get very high tollerances as you discover this sloppy primitive method of making capacitors.
Other than being larger than commercial capacitors, they are very good at keeping the correct values through a very large voltage range.
Hot glue is good to stick the rolls tight against moisture. I use 3M clear tape for holding the roll rolled up tight, and temporarly placing parts. Super glue the electrodes in place.
Cheers
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

...

Headers

Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Sender [email protected]
X-Apparently-To [email protected]
X-Received (qmail 26169 invoked by uid 102); 26 Jan 2018 09:42:13 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mtaq2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.193.84.33) by m7.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Jan 2018 09:42:13 -0000
X-Received (qmail 4738 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2018 09:42:13 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mta1005.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.100.120) by mtaq2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Jan 2018 09:42:13 -0000
X-Original-Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Received-SPF pass (domain of gmx.net designates 212.227.17.20 as permitted sender)
X-YMailISG EQ46ITAWLDvzEIx38donqCfQD0jTULxpCHSr_v4FsvQPAPuB rnzK9oJrrPqGanx3kj41lQs4V6eBYPjdTixkIk8Sb5GyD.G7i47fJqFoQ4.p yqU9ixvSN5x232d.AoEcMAJCVeq.s_LW6r3mr4r29pKRSv.c1FCIzf.vkXrz be_mT5ZV0MiopYkvWSvMpwdZRRvcgUQLmBkCgEc.oL_XSZlT1nXT8LR98Vb_ T4PACmTsW6AcrVKxKexibLJUsmL.EoDBKoZbuh9IJx2LkaANNCUzpQ18ctiy roEE6Nh69JS_D7FIwd91Ytr6s5xERUgQyYOX2OCA2TZgN2VCrkxFVIv5nLpO TZpb11ZDp5rq_0HWlZEPK73eJMn7VkH5AJ63PC5HwvKRaVHK4gTnuOGWVSFf 2LrXknC96m9QsKbi31KrD2yL1UOZ5IrZ_H78C0bZSNyZlX2SumpPSOmG12XQ LkaseJpjSDv.ciSRil0Y8JQa6rzCsShRg.K0CAPjHv3ryIlG0lyovJyXq8R2 kbycrjNDPLW.vM..YGSqfsbpaAW.VoXY2.ZIDqDLHFfmQEO2LGn.4GjT2GIF lNr.HLCDvcBe3ycpb3c6Jz3ptMKMm7gjY_KW_PErYXiqonk70P.W5uqpWeZa b2pgyeK1GlZeMpJnWuFn6ZmAJIeOHG6r2q9HcJaeJ0WsV6HNWMNuDAV0FVFg 8igshYkmfpEbVS75sD19pKsu1.FWkvyZNVL_.52Woch8TkUFA7luaobYQ.XB fnMq5W2aJmgJM_SdJTHmUNXGl2NX35edFKCi.PIBR1M1DnQobNsMBCQ5dNwV EyfsVwnOiVceNohdZYbXl8ddaHulqpqN4_iVM1bZOa.iYOxGjavaqNwUnt7O _apjJN_k8_u0LQoxh24QT5QEE2NlsZWeEzi2ZNBZ1xVaYoS4.4s7VHUHVEDn umARRaXibUbv3TBGTw8AT6sV2vevy3qnZp4MUT7rLtZnRF8TX2qzWv4NzsSV dFNnLhsY38MSzrTNmAxxFtrSeJZG18MZVKM_9psYndzay_rpBuzy2lwfc0jc XMmNNpCGPU1vhAvBU8_ll1L62mNFUgEsoxDscZUn2HshP813gt4oiMzqF5XR ZFrIK6.Qq5e94fxCDzEY5vWhOJvEiLaczhKNRjgFpWfU3S_fKbbA4.2m5ERS Jho1Lv_nle5YuA.tvzAAWGfrpco4VZ97WpxlkDHofZuvgMLXz05pHLPNIWmc RS08P8AGFlBOhfLXLDfdzHbwIiAOv3c-
Authentication-Results mta1005.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=gmx.net; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=gmx.net; dkim=neutral (no sig)
X-Received from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO mout.gmx.net) (212.227.17.20) by mta1005.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 09:42:12 +0000
X-Received from [10.238.1.98] ([80.187.109.22]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MMYZG-1ehk4t3Wuc-008KhZ for <[email protected]>; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:42:10 +0100
Date Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:42:06 +0100
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Importance normal
To [email protected]
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.android.email_379056912626280"
X-Provags-ID V03:K0:02+QxZ9l5ogcA56KeLoIXPs1Blmplg529yfod/h+yANJiwooO/2 gXpmelhSXohkhjJ8yofKw4w5EusVs/BWVWvuUPZNTNhAGHwtxtExxRuMlbepZFpByDZzCao kMjlToKr0yXdT91R1PCf/5DqeKK79A5bL1l5tfmy3U21BSf/qEqPCTM5dabbLVR2Kmy+Tsj JQSN3LGbLmJ1A0KIZddzQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults notjunk:1;V01:K0:gIWJey5jw6I=:wOc3IsCnjnTxkSOG0GVK6X uYsElnRzqPMJ1AsD+ZoPqAyLTj3BCiJgPYMjQ5miSXkXQXL5WM1rqgDCZQ8oSOETkDft+04K7 qVBJnYj0IrRzeEBG96Wk+y602S1pktUcFc4vbDD9kbyOxAp0nriRI+ahdTZqi/YCFwNUu7Jet WiVFrrzwklY6WyGnuhWlZupXRCs+gDbSu9aUNh364X3vVzal7UtNOHUhDvHy+N3KW+VnbaqNX s1YtKBqWggFa2/boks2AOUivCwr8yukKpx77/Sgp+DZXAlpXE5AGN2Z8QAOdaQRtwRQbcY8vE UwF2sBdcsJB9BbmoG3uzE6XESs15IR2RjDnAWcv6zpryUFiyJcmYc4iKDX1C0M84fsf/upAFt yZ9v0b4XgvhMHpMqHqlOxVUHzIrg0NsUxZW+JQWoIBj60zt3/UYsaap3NGn59ecEIWH1eWl28 cXyvuacPuswreGq9EY0+oSRzfyqmQl0wey+hBeHxQvZk0pe5w3sr1I5r4iro0LaQhEwD2iZu/ xMEZ0y9gkdaqPWYK+GFxR2cj4UxjZi+sfNP+9uOHWXZn+FMjsSuv4/pf+yuEQwbmY3ORYsE+0 OHSmx3XsInrqWHqsKhiiVOcE20pe1uRXIu/axnYeblNeVecewYCczR0CoUFtNMF2u+VsDSLYJ 2BXYhlQ4BRtQwhZPrVIM3zFLsBOV3W2QrPJCmfQy/Kem08M33tWmpxEMrnpeIhPbfcMzd0co9 KAk9irpYlLIc4dk2vjoYaIRoLeWm65xzf50ka8n2oUy0ZeCpQmdxaZEILZTmkdY5n4yUv19+w VwHHz9jPs5+QGp8TdwpY29zMU4rgEKhNGnHw+NrZqtW/lVupaU=
X-Originating-IP 98.138.100.120
Subject AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Aw: Re: AW: [EVGRAY] Re: Kone & Hector, you guys finally did it!
X-Yahoo-Group-Post member; u=562176542; y=S0YLP8jyAzaQQ8gpB-Yju8R3bnore-nYeJxI62rpz8oCjg
X-Yahoo-Profile svenf73
From "S.friedrich" <[email protected]>