Re: Aw: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Re: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.

Database ID: 105395
2017-12-30T09:33:24-05:00

← View thread

Message-ID
In-Reply-To: <trinity-6ed82fcc-13f3-41e9-8590-22651fc08334-1514635820604@3c-app-gmx-bs66>

Body

Sven,

I don't think you have components that would allow for higher impedance 
on the resonance coil.  I don't understand that claim concerning the 
high impedance other than if one looks at it from the standpoint of 
antenna engineering and RF.  Suppose what he is trying to say is the RV 
is translating EM to RF and during the translation is where the extra 
energy is harvested.    My own intuition says it is harvested on the 
vacuum side, the sucking side, as a part of the phase transform function 
or as you said when field collapses and is allowed to be useful rather 
than quenched or fought against.

It is interesting many switching supplies use a HF flyback pulse to fill 
capacitors.  Hector said any of these supplies can run over unity with 
slight modification.

It would be a good exercise to build the TV using vacuum tube 
electronics in the switching areas being damaged.  Tubes are high 
impedance but with a lower capacitance than FET's  they also do not 
allow for anything to block other primordial energies.

I had a presentation from the 80's from the Tesla society and I forget 
the presenter.  Anyhow he took some old tube shortwaves into a mine or 
cave, somewhere underground along with solid state.  The tube equipment 
could hear the Russian woodpecker and some other things while the SS was 
just noise.  He claimed tubes could detect and amplify the scalar field.

You did not answer why you think the transformer jumped sideways, due to 
what?


On 12/30/2017 7:10 AM, 'Sven Friedrich' [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
> Hello Mick,
>
> that's all right, it works fine too. The resonance causes the 
> saturation of the transformer and one hears it clearly how transformer 
> works in resonance. Extraction is the problem.
> Hector always writes that you have to adjust the load, however he 
> likes to do it. As I see it or understand it, there is a pros and cons 
> for the resonance. I think that you can recharge your batteries so 
> that they are permanently destroyed as he wrote it.
> The diode plug is the solution I think because we only work with 
> capacitor charges.
>
> I always wonder when Hector writes that radiant energy is always or 
> most effectively seen in high impedance.
>
> High impedance is for me the AC resistance in reactances.
>
> Does that mean for me on the transverter applied that the inductance 
> should be as high as possible in the resonance coil?!?
>
> I can connect the windings so that I come well over 1000V but for the 
> power is small and the capacity is small.
>
> In my Magnetic Voltage Constant, the inductance of the resonance coil 
> is almost 1 Henry and the reactive voltage is well over 1000V. The 
> resonant capacitors are connected in series to withstand the voltage.
>
> The problem with high voltages are always the components that have to 
> endure, such as insulation, capacitors, switches, etc.
>
> regards
>
> Sven
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 29. Dezember 2017 um 19:11 Uhr
> *Von:* "Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]>
> *An:* [email protected]
> *Betreff:* Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Aw: Re: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Re: 
> [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.
>
> Sven,
>
> Why do you think the tranny jumped to the side?
>
> Was this magnetostriction or something else like lorentz force?
>
> A properly setup transverter is likely creating a  hyperbolic 
> torsional field during collapse.
>
> When creating the self sustained self amplified spinning vortex 
> coupling to the earth magnetic spin is when crazy shit can happen.
>
> Picture the similar spin of an RV's fields inside the transformer.
>
> On 12/29/2017 11:47 AM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>     So with adjustable impedance (Variac) in series from the powered
>     Variac I could bring the BLDC in motion with the asynchronous
>     motor and also reduce the power consumption to a minimum. The
>     manual readings indicated a very low energy intake. The input
>     power at the digital socket meter showed very high values. Very
>     funny, I probably would not have fed any energy into the net.
>     laughing.
>
>     You can not do everything and experiment all around.
>     One should already fixate on a topic in this big topic.
>
>     So I praised the transverter, it's so nice and easy to bring it
>     into resonance, the 50-60Hz technique allows you to use simple
>     thyristors to discharge the diode plug capacitors.
>
>     Sometimes I think it's the impulse that comes from the diode plug,
>     which releases the free energy in the subsequent transformer first.
>
>     The way I understood it all is the key. By bringing a transformer
>     into saturation with a strong short energetic pulse and by
>     collapsing the magnetic field, additional energy is drawn in from
>     the environment into the collapsing field.
>
>     This impulse has to hit the transformer like a hammer blow. I've
>     already connected a 40 kg transformer with a SCR to a 5000 uF, the
>     whole transformer has jumped to the side, unfortunately the SCR
>     has not survived that, even though it should withstand more than
>     2500 A for μseconds.
>
>     Of course, the impulse should be as small as possible so that just
>     the saturation is reached, a stronger impulse would be just waste.
>
>     Request for improvement of my understanding of the matter.
>
>     regards
>
>     Sven
>
>

References

<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<trinity-6ed82fcc-13f3-41e9-8590-22651fc08334-1514635820604@3c-app-gmx-bs66>

Headers

Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Sender [email protected]
X-Apparently-To [email protected]
X-Received (qmail 15368 invoked by uid 102); 30 Dec 2017 14:33:37 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mtaq2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.193.84.33) by m10.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Dec 2017 14:33:37 -0000
X-Received (qmail 25142 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2017 14:33:36 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mta1005.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.100.120) by mtaq2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Dec 2017 14:33:36 -0000
X-Original-Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Received-SPF pass (domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.217.195 as permitted sender)
X-YMailISG sqR497cWLDvk0oSeSGgqIeeSoVUAF1k36P93QlU1OW90XZni jltMbvUpm7QX_Rs3HjERdgLBb1AlVPq_0oUFl5hveFzIqZrgFiHbud5nOMrd js7KIGFl4P4uQMP4gC8P3pfX8nKy1oQ7xnq4RzfZ3XwE68W_RrPTXC1eptDL loLaS3PcWpskag5p3ZpCAQ4ihLtMV_Xb_cjiQLgmWrSS0YnrL6McAO0ejjjb 6KxvT13vnWnpnAtxBM9ET8c07T_FgUH6YPHF5K7lL3G.y1Fj5Ci6m3y.vLNQ Zuxd2oMQu.WenOOd9CYDfC26evpd4yBOoAJgKj36CVW2O8cN3PuYfRT4nkpB 5rBwAzx8U83XfOxhMhz0OkC7tMurp__6lO02XbSKooD_yjBc0CX3ryL.ioCs 1dVdliGoEdCMKtMm.QycpjWLBOpnqUQ19h3dQ.dhNhGYb_qAzQPueWdH2aU4 kApnGn1TxWdzugSra2Sv1rEi8JTkmjfTEHIy3.XCS7DzZKkoy93Prd5Z.xZt X0pj71bGKoezrTM5TWPrzs_IhXVNj99YOnZROEZOKOZ36bPLULv1DXV6ssmj M98qPJkc4JIb7HLaPJtor._iFDY8JsqJofug1Pc49c.0B.tjBR1L99EoTbyW GBY9dIZX3WZxM6UgWkYvyKiXWHBwMfqChiAKiKpkY5BJyK9IW_SfaOu8jC.v By.pF.CldoaoKVIGm7PM7Ra2.hq91vk66lJ7uJFTpgYECV2GtMjir0yHhf1U pUkEngfAN7Jd0GyBmn4wXg44Subbs6MpVY8H0DhtUlpavf8KfWTa.LhKH660 m9hJQYGKFFQQvM79Sr.NoYjqwoVJ.kA4F4cDr5iRdlxHT..1oMLU_k9M8zVm BcUSKg_Ho8RzgRtADU7a1K6Uc0eceTzpehTwyUYDoCV2O7VBmANgnXeV6Wil bcew785tMEgZ2HM85cMXwTgdKDX2Ns8kLCjdsfiSEPxuyAdZScoOBA36qocn ReJrJmck5VnHyk3YKnWEDMz3SPNne4i8QUTGBRTuzkGRfMwqvPhYMQlcohzk czNYpsGnPvKHm._DbwDuosghvPQBaOGRRPlqfRGuqmzg_W2eIlhWNeXiUitQ 9YEqGMJxDs7D_X61cvDaFshfLXyno0cPTmfzk_9VBAZkzDaItMIGSy2uCmuR UZ3xdFyyavRImq.Gz8386C80gdOd2rxLmTWG5Bc3DxyECTjzqTmVAzROOutx 5GRmKlCvj3kdQh7ZRMLwmx2CfZ1R1CgACyPhGXGrbFqiF75vsc7IGqF6mnLu U3bbE7TtKAd_wzj30_esyc8mbt7pyU0ZXzm6gdSHtpQI6H6dJWmGXcYgekTv 5ufGYyLxeDsdtj93bHiFxemMBjgiHZfZ6rApW2WrDxJGc4oc79uTw.onllo9 l2ghd8Thg1yCEPZRWew7.K0lXCPo3w--
Authentication-Results mta1005.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=gmail.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=gmail.com; dkim=pass (ok)
X-Received from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO mail-ua0-f195.google.com) (209.85.217.195) by mta1005.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:33:36 +0000
X-Received by mail-ua0-f195.google.com with SMTP id g16so16676501uak.2 for <[email protected]>; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 06:33:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=E7cO9N7C3EiNj4Ml0BOlKnIeatOoA/DfzuLLl5fn0DM=; b=dCp2SvQtUVKef9Q2PQLyuDEmu7m8fNwqi3lM3gPxkIBOI4Bd5MbgF6cIvkbCDLNyOY +aXPqfBaAYeaRu9ZEE9fkq/NnPWie92TejrfhWEb6jYatSr8BW4lWHO5dClDCTcNOeUh 9YCvQo3jae8prjdsz/c+X/3TEvydXROdvmr2bLJYgNV44iBcx8qYiKKnmw8w8IuUEm2w ou7hE/njwEM+RtSvviz/5aOV5enIsms0rtxRaeLiXIJ5u/ZGS1r76V2nv5prxxJmfNdF C5zU8I/HTnScc1jHwDMDWJqKKrEssJ8VKiORkVOFMWgyqdhHJUrAwsf7QxQFsPwxiNv/ 3wFw==
X-Gm-Message-State AKGB3mJg3fVwd4gXdp/UncJrI+WvTEO1CWz9agsId/1ICLNcixDbaL4L hdEI0g5reSPnxQQkvmIJN0KZAQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source ACJfBovq5vnHK0oMCO/Wce7BgI1yBJx7XXjqP164wmOc03AiqOKZ4UINWHrNnPGuKqwICFUwBD/35w==
X-Received by 10.176.79.194 with SMTP id t2mr33086733uah.80.1514644414746; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 06:33:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Received from [192.168.88.250] ([181.139.152.243]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m127sm5792829vka.27.2017.12.30.06.33.33 for <[email protected]> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 30 Dec 2017 06:33:34 -0800 (PST)
To [email protected]
References <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <trinity-6ed82fcc-13f3-41e9-8590-22651fc08334-1514635820604@3c-app-gmx-bs66>
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Date Sat, 30 Dec 2017 09:33:24 -0500
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <trinity-6ed82fcc-13f3-41e9-8590-22651fc08334-1514635820604@3c-app-gmx-bs66>
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="------------063B1727AFC2BD9FF4F64A4D"
Content-Language en-US
X-Originating-IP 98.138.100.120
Subject Re: Aw: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Re: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.
X-Yahoo-Group-Post member; u=367442549; y=JrRpup-DhQV1qQD3sLz_3GFs0JbJCmmQ2qCxoJLZOAbdIDo
X-Yahoo-Profile mkjekyll
From Mick <[email protected]>