AW: Re: Re: Re: [EVGRAY] Oscilloscope problematic.

Database ID: 105241
2017-12-18T08:59:46+01:00
Sven Friedrich <[email protected]>

← View thread

Message-ID
In-Reply-To: NONE

Body

Hi Gerry, in Hector last Transverter Posting he has switched 2 coupling capacitors between diode plug circuit and transverter. This can only be a sheath current filter as it is used in Bnc lines to suppress common mode noise, I think malfunctions that are caused by the switching of the thyristors when they switch load. Greetings Sven
Von Samsung Mobile gesendet

-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: "Gerry [email protected] [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]> 
Datum:17.12.2017  23:24  (GMT+01:00) 
An: [email protected] 
Betreff: Re: Re: Re: [EVGRAY] Oscilloscope problematic. 

Wow Sven,
That's a heavy duty shunt you have there!
The big bolts are to carry the large current under test in and out of the resistor via brass blocks on either end.

The two smaller connections are the voltage measuring points, the resistance is correct between these two points.
It is correct to place your measuring device here, but like me & Ole said.... have to pay attention to your earthing points.

I can see a high current connection to the left end but not the right hand end of the shunt? 
Where does this current come out? 

I don't exactly understand your words in your email above "I still need capacitors for the sheath current filter because I lie partially over 600V, or in series...."

Do you mean the whole shunt is floating at 600V above/below  ground potential?

Sorry... me easily confused

Since shunt is intended for up to 200A and you are only using it at 35A the voltage per amp is going to be quite small.
So  noise and contact potential errors may creep in through dissimilar types of metal at junctions.

I do recommend to try a clip on type ammeter or Hall effect probe for these kinds of measurements.
Gerry.

Here is a link to some other shunt resistors also 
https://www.jaycar.com.au/search?text=current+shunt&CSRFToken=0cf93697-a46e-4fc8-ada7-969a3dc631c3



 




On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:53 PM, 'Sven Friedrich' [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> wrote:


Hi Gerry, I measure at this shunt. The small lines that are led out, I connect to my scope..
I think 200A max. rich for my max. 35 amps in transverter reactive.
I still need capacitors for the sheath current filter because I lie partially over 600V, or in series.

regards

Sven
 
Gesendet: Sonntag, 17. Dezember 2017 um 02:31 Uhr
Von: "[email protected] [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]>
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Oscilloscope problematic.
 
Hi Sven,

Sometimes the high current shunts are 4 terminal resistors.
Usually the two larger terminals are for the current in and out connection.
The actual nominal value of resistance is only correct between the voltage terminals.
Which aren't designed to carry large currents.
 
They are also calibrated in so many nominal mV per Amp rather than Ohms.
 Gerry

Headers

Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Sender [email protected]
X-Apparently-To [email protected]
X-Received (qmail 3686 invoked by uid 102); 18 Dec 2017 07:59:45 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mtaq3.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.193.84.142) by m7.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2017 07:59:45 -0000
X-Received (qmail 29549 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2017 07:59:45 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mta1002.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (98.139.170.166) by mtaq3.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2017 07:59:45 -0000
X-Original-Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Received-SPF pass (domain of gmx.net designates 212.227.15.18 as permitted sender)
X-YMailISG 5v_7_MMWLDsjTmZtI3LvWoNNb6HbSuIQnpBDT84DqznYQVLH FXw4UcLymdPVPQpWxueDFdqWnl7uWhyH7JkU.e5zpqKsUZu1ou4T1LfXuNOA yxCRump2inb6lgdYhPMPpfZm4841qgjTIMAoTuFW_8Bj1UKTGhMBND5WArIV J9q6EWc7mF0rmVl4R_3LFxUZ4e_NH6avy5h7kHJvxvV5H3eGMZ3Don.N9LQH p.cfWxiHY8dpyGjGd0m66bzPwUvTZKpQCE1YoY4eN_nY0fGRdEV9OtnEv96w FaRrD2It9iA6xEkrP35lVPAu8X4XT6CvfCQ_os17E_d1J9K7L_VmCffwvq3f ThbxX7VmsxgJozlwB_Orn3I0zaAVCBLi4zUtXWiBoGCsgHlwfHNUTa3FtAWo cT6a4eqa6taGhS_cN1gY63480k9YAlnsQ8BkIriMgtCcvMerYljlCEJUYSBf yI1nLmRGbYiP49NcvHXG8265THDVRYryRR8Hx84xOJ3HlZTP5nS.RWvXKp7_ RusMe8v98CsL7dimtTgc6nMw6K4kHEjIBS85Sxf1Fc6ptywhe8UdeKFp_5M7 CPwobkOZkG.gwOYL3U_3nhzAokR3uhMTDal6sQ4cZiUbu9AyRMdmcURCXOao n0L4pwwGSNhA4l_9i.v366NnD2mRerEW6tZSuKjkq_hQNK9EErfbnKmcNmGW 9htRKMlHIjYlobPUbsTJMwO3jXXyrO1EOo53hy4zpPm_MMZH48OLeDp8l1AB Dy2DbNYfY4ekm7N__Q1bxeMFuNuHJtz2lVj76OEzvTmaNj3fbza2kx2jFdmg u0G..Sqmq7C4j0PC.abIyPj6aP.AzAB60TcO.WkpChuniTBeCU2pTk7aVpPY 8IOvLsBGdt9.ChWRveTSpOB836dkH.vbQZUX5ey6kX1OP85kB5ryN8zARvJH 3k2iAHxD4zVip1Rp1NOlfTMacLHJZQ1JAtlBRNFt24By14S_xf8oh9NRFD_X HnebqYJ6JkSK_OjVTKaM4vmnlPlfc17ROZ1F29TAN81dzlVC_lg3WROWTyCr JkLxYfXleyx1kLN4TVxSPxk6piVGuhBMmU.oAOCDxAn.mWlz05jzeztaDJ2n yWh7LplY2t.JtsVCSr43.t5ktrNwr6M54s4W71s8oxfUs4BLk7V6r_0AWLjt gLAMoo40RWSGUB2tWwBxa7tKEuY_7FzFxlNdwY7vMt4yxLPBL5GC18.nt.wF MQIO3_Bsd11Ucdqdmk6JJIPtL63jbZNlJUpq9.oRZmeFcRpw34eIyv4O2.zt YLszyYC8PB0.JlDWj3i8KWD3qfXn
Authentication-Results mta1002.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=gmx.net; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=gmx.net; dkim=neutral (no sig)
X-Received from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO mout.gmx.net) (212.227.15.18) by mta1002.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:59:45 +0000
X-Received from [172.16.2.67] ([185.65.193.230]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHH6Z-1eClhT0gy3-00E5Cz for <[email protected]>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:59:44 +0100
Date Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:59:46 +0100
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Importance normal
To [email protected]
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.android.email_13458717315816360"
X-Provags-ID V03:K0:LDTOG3HdBfEb7aeNKkS1EGWdkEwXSkqNooDimKwPEvPTezsfbXn qz0rMfvr4/GPUEFTCUr/NBIXmCQzYEMQ82IrPxArKV4D1KHD/IRNbh62XDJgTB4zg5erm1P NGT2AMxNVJRVqmVrCmscmzMAs35YSZ1EsKB+Eba6HupUebnA1yC/HEW4avufj7CcDJ70aEQ 8JRY5waDioZht+t/7xgyg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults notjunk:1;V01:K0:GaQF79W4Wy8=:rbLQMBaaT3fgx79GpDA0Ty SfoaCgFpqazV2hfQkk2lo8NW9G3oa53bWs5VJFHgwwCPVuxeE7JuMRKiEzaNGhZf6eyQ9w89j bvGjiqeBpEN3FTc14+2irJ28dqmoO3XCM97/3CBgCMKGjcfgkTvtuv83GZPsH6cjtMWReyyCx V9nHMcT/E5hkjzUQQRPnEnFrXwsDrnOqfwo/o/ExHnVnzN99q54du90SpG8YZGc5rxKDaEAZb 93RcYEGkerNOBWFzKYiIdXxjRALw0JVcx3GmwamCGORuBUzjli4srQE6WN4j0B78TnmA1tItx 9RHBJwNeX2wv6qTWKSYjjBdTGEoDqWrQi+p5x66yGVijxGyBCrQQfNA91NV6Aj9bNlWLtx8Y1 IgDH4FuNCAZtMm1ZWTXSIYISNfDHq2Vd7TvSrVlAYtK1rEOytrxdsBJ+aeQjJuNR/UGjnAebu Mc3FATEDu29HqjcLxd+rVoaOaR69W/JtfnZe8wTPGdIj59I/qZ77Jw9EFJm9HYgk8f674BxUn zkTSB1S1IYcuNsnRjsgoT1WmdliBMDSdmyEh88G8nblALNCHxGaScdcReuYXkRPGP0fHZrk2f ysI5t0IjYHYoj3yrPnlXWMwX6JZ1a04KPqSgtXEQTdK6EcJfQbFOpBRZQFwsYgQ9EDBZ6owVQ 00GE65NtxOkmptinQpaPnWsabXItbIlB9V1SYkOglLD9pzL/cp5FWI9mEqxfiClyMdZs0mZgu hkRFpez30qRL3ckqNSBt0YzMkYQyLDxByvj/kiKBEco1FPkj9lixqjS0crJbZLCD3u3NnyQj0 hp4yoeVDXF8T42FmkNnHPPwpeDg2OONsWHq65Ez0s1a2AgTHvc=
X-Originating-IP 98.139.170.166
Subject AW: Re: Re: Re: [EVGRAY] Oscilloscope problematic.
X-Yahoo-Group-Post member; u=562176542; y=FxwqGBMGMEtUpjlj05j2NXE9pvc6rEqBQBXHG8GG5JCchQ
X-Yahoo-Profile svenf73
From "S.friedrich" <[email protected]>